Wall Street Chronicle

Trump tells Congress ceasefire means he does not need their approval for Iran war

trump-tells-congress-ceasefire-means-he-does-not-need-their-approval-for-iran-war

Trump tells Congress ceasefire means he does not need their approval for Iran war

Trump claims congressional approval for war ‘has never been sought before’

President Donald Trump has told Congress that US hostilities with Iran have “terminated” owing to an ongoing ceasefire, as he argued that he did not need lawmakers’ authorisation for the conflict.

It came on the 60th day since he formally notified Congress of strikes against Iran.

US law requires him to “terminate any use of United States Armed Forces” within 60 days of such a notification – unless Congress allows a continuation.

Despite the ceasefire, the US and Iran have not yet reached a longer-term deal via talks, though Iranian media reported a new proposal from Tehran sent via Pakistan on Friday.

Iranian state news agency IRNA reported that a proposal for negotiations with the US was sent to Pakistan intermediaries.

The news agency did not publish the details, and it’s unclear if the proposal has reached the US.

President Trump told reporters on Friday afternoon: “We just had a conversation with Iran. Let’s see what happens. But, I would say that I am not happy.”

He said a deal has been hard to reach in part because Iranian leadership was “very confused”, after a number of its top military officials were killed in the war.

Trump said he was briefed with options by US Central Command on Thursday, ranging from “blast the hell out of them and finish them forever” to “make a deal”.

Later on Friday, Trump said: “they’re not coming through with the kind of deal that we have to have.

“And we’re going to get this thing done properly. We’re not going to leave early and then have the problem arise in three more years.”

Meanwhile, the US Treasury has issued a notice warning that any individual or company that pays Iran a “toll” for passage through the Strait of Hormuz was at risk of violating US sanctions.

The key shipping channel is still effectively closed – causing economic impacts around the world.

Trump told congressional leaders on Friday in a letter that: “There has been no exchange of fire between the United States Forces and Iran since April 7, 2026. The hostilities that began on February 28, 2026 have terminated.”

In Congress, lawmakers have faced mounting questions about whether they intend to schedule a vote in each chamber to decide whether the war should receive formal authorisation.

Trump administration officials have been in conversation with members of Congress about gaining congressional approval, the BBC’s US partner CBS reported.

The relevant piece of US law, the decades-old War Powers Resolution, makes certain requirements of a president “within sixty calendar days” of their use of US armed forces in combat.

It requires a president to end the use of those forces unless Congress makes a formal declaration of war or allows the president an extension, up to 30 days in length, for the “prompt removal” of troops.

The law was passed in 1973 to limit the ability of then-President Richard Nixon to continue waging war in Vietnam.

Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also argued before a congressional hearing on Thursday that the clock had paused on the deadline to seek legislators’ approval.

The questioner, Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, responded: “I do not believe the statute would support that.”

Democratic-led attempts in both chambers of Congress to constrain Trump in the case of Iran have repeatedly failed.

Most Republicans have opposed the Democratic efforts, though some have indicated they might reconsider their positions after the 60-day mark.

Asked on Friday about seeking authorisation from Congress, Trump told reporters, “no other country has ever done it”.

“Most people consider it totally unconstitutional,” he said.

The Trump administration’s interpretation of the War Powers Resolution has been questioned by some experts.

Prof Heather Brandon-Smith, from Georgetown University Law in Washington DC said that even if a ceasefire is legally in effect, it would not stop the clock.

“A ceasefire is not a permanent end to the conflict,” she said. “To my mind, a permanent end to the conflict is what would actually sort of close up the 60 days.”

The courts or Congress, she said, would be the only means to stop the war if the Trump administration continues the conflict.

The conflict began when the US and Israel launched wide-ranging strikes on Iran, killing the country’s supreme leader. Iran responded by launching attacks on Israel and US-allied states in the Gulf.

The US and Israel have led Western opposition to Iran’s nuclear programme, claiming the country is seeking to develop a nuclear bomb, which Tehran has denied.

Exit mobile version